Clinicopathological Features and Treatment Challenges in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective: As the genetic and molecular profiles of triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) are elucidated, multiple therapeutic targets have been produced. TNBC with less than 1% androgen receptor (AR) expression may respond to enzalutamide with greater response association in higher levels. A metronomic dose of capecitabine and docetaxel are effective developed drugs for angiogenic process inhibition. We aimed to demonstrate the treatment outcome of triple-negative breast cancer patients in correlation to their clinicopathological features. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 80 TNBC patients was conducted. The patients underwent proper observation with the reporting of their treatment and follow-up data. Patients with a metastatic disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, follow-up drop or data shortage were excluded from the survival analysis. Results: The study results revealed a significant association between negative androgen expression and younger age ≤35 years, premenopausal status, higher grade, extracapsular extension, lymphovascular invasion, Ki 67, and CA15-3 (p=0.003, 0.02, <0.001, 0.001, 0.027, 0.005, 0.009 respectively). The three-year overall survival (OS) in patients who received bicalutamide was better than those patients who received capecitabine or docetaxel but of no significance (p=0.46). The three-year disease free survival (DFS) was significantly better in the bicalutamide arm versus the other two groups (p=0.012). Conclusions: We concluded that extended adjuvant antiandrogen such as bicalutamide and metronomic capecitabine are well tolerated with accepted compliance and affordability compared to docetaxel and are warranted for problem-solving and better DFS and OS in some TNBC patients.


INTRODUCTION
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that represents 12-17% of all breast cancers (BC) is defined by less than 1% of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor expression, and normal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene copy number and expression (1).TNBCs have more aggressive behavior than non-TNBCs.Patients with TNBC tend to have higher relapse rates and probability of CNS and visceral metastases than those with non-TNBC (2).
Different genomic and molecular technique applications have revealed TNBC heterogeneity in the form of basal-like (BL), immunomodulatory (IM), mesenchymal (M), and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtypes, and each one demonstrates a unique pattern of gene expression.Because of the elucidated genetic and molecular profiles of TNBC, multiple therapeutic targets have been produced and TNBCs are amenable for treatment intervention (3).
Anthracycline and taxane-based protocols of chemotherapy were considered as the mainstay treatment of TNBC patients (4).Treatment guidelines of early TNBC patients did not include platinum agents, but their use is explained in specific cases, such as those with a high risk of relapse and in need of rapid disease control, where the use of carboplatin was recommended for patients with known mutant BRCA; however, a carboplatin-based combination is one of the available protocols for adjuvant treatment nowadays (5).activation of function domain AF1 that includes the tau 1 and tau 2 transcription activating units essential for androgen receptor activity.The amino-terminal domain contains a polyglutamine (CAG) sequence with various repetition numbers (6).Rebbeck et al. have discovered the relationship between patients carrying at least one AR allele with more than 28 CAG repeats and a significant risk of breast cancer (7).
Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 12-55% of TNBC cases (8)(9)(10).Some variation in expression frequency between studies is due to the different use of anti-AR antibodies or an assay cutoff difference (1% versus 10%).BC with less than 1% AR expression may respond to enzalutamide and may be associated with greater response in higher levels of AR expression (8).In AR-positive TNBC subtype patients, bicalutamide is well tolerated and could be proposed as an alternative to cytotoxic chemotherapy in such patients with better OS and DFS outcomes (11).
In comparison to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, capecitabine has shown differential activity in TNBC in limited reported data (12).The proposal of metronomic chemotherapy is defined by the close and the regular intervals of chronic administration of low doses of cytotoxic drugs with no prolonged drug-free interruptions, in favor of lower toxicity and risk of drug-resistant tumor cell emergence in comparison to conventional administration (13).TNBC is considered a highly proliferative tumor with more enhanced angiogenesis that supports rapid growth and early metastasis, and tends to have high levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).The metronomic dose of capecitabine is effective in TNBC as it leads to inhibition of the angiogenic process (14).Docetaxel therapy has a significant role in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant management of triple negative breast cancer patients (15).Metronomic administration of docetaxel has achieved survival gains (16).
Compared to non-TNBC cases, TNBC cases are characterized by higher levels of VEGF and the blockade of angiogenesis will therefore lead to improving the outcomes in such patients.This was investigated in adjuvant phase III trials that evaluated the addition of one year of metronomic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate CM maintenance therapy (International Breast Cancer Study Group-22-00), as well as bevacizumab for one year proposed as standard chemotherapy (BEATRICE Study) (17).In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the outcome of triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with various strategies in correlation to their clinicopathological features.

MATERIAL and METHODS
Eighty TNBC patients were conducted to general surgery, pathology, clinical oncology, and medical oncology departments as a multidisciplinary team in a retrospective cohort study from January 2016 to January 2020.The patient data were collected from the patient's records with approval by the local ethics committee (Approval no: 6394-15-09-2020, Date: 15.09.2020).Focusing on the patient's clinical outcome post adjuvant treatment period as extending treatment.Patients with metastatic disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy proposal, follow-up drop, and data shortage were excluded from the survival analysis.Included patients underwent proper observation with reporting of their treatment and follow-up data, besides the proper history and physical examinations.Full lab, chest x-ray, pelvic abdominal ultrasonography, mammography, breast ultrasound, CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis with contrast, CT brain or MRI with contrast were requested.A bone scan was requested according to the clinical conditions such as bone pain in the early stage and was performed in all local advanced and metastatic cases.Some patients underwent a PET scan.At the general surgery department, the patients underwent either a true-cut or excisional biopsy, breast conservation, or modified radical mastectomy.Eighty patients were proposed adjuvant chemotherapy and 71 patients out of 80 received adjuvant radiotherapy.

Interpretation of Immunohistochemical Staining
For ER and PR expression, moderate to strong nuclear staining in ≥ 1% of the tumor cells was considered positive.Her2/neu was considered positive if at least 10% of tumor cells exhibited 3+ cell membrane staining.The cut-off point for Ki67 expression was 14%.AR expression was semiquantitatively scored using an H-score like the method described by Niemeier et al.An immunohistochemical score >10 was considered as a positive result (18).
We analyzed the extended adjuvant treatment after initially proposed protocols of chemotherapy ± radiotherapy, which was reported in patient files and records.Hence, patients were followed in 3 groups: the first received bicalutamide (anti-androgen) in AR positive in 50 mg, with or without meals once daily for 2 years, and group 2 who had negative AR and received capecitabine 650 mg/ m 2 BID for one year, and group 3 patients who had unknown AR status and received docetaxel in a protocol of 15mg/ m 2 in weekly for 4 weeks to be escalated to 20 mg/m 2 once per week with accepted lab consideration for 6 months.

Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD and median (range), and the categorical variables were expressed as a number (percentage).The percentages of categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chisquare test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate.The trend of change in the distribution of relative frequencies between ordinal data was compared using the Chi-square test for trend.Overall Survival (OS) was calculated as the time from diagnosis to death or the most recent followup contact (censored).Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was calculated as the time from the date of surgery to the date of relapse or the most recent follow-up contact when patient was known to be relapse-free.Stratification of OS and DFS was done according to intention to treat (ITT).These timeto-event distributions were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier plot and compared using a two-sided exact log-rank test.All tests were two-sided.A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.All statistics were performed using SPSS 22.0 for windows (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Clinicopathological Features
The mean age at presentation was 42.60 ±12.05 years.Most of the cases were grade III (56.3%) and 82.5 % showed lymph node metastasis.IDC of no special type was the most common histopathological type (65%).As regards the pathologic stage, 55% of the cases were T1 with lymphovascular invasion in 55% of the cases.The clinicopathological data of the cases enrolled in this study were summarized in (Table I).

Toxicity Outcome
Bicalutamide was well tolerated as 17 (81%) patients out of 21 patients had shown no toxicity, only 2 patients showed grade (G) 2 hot flushes, one patient showed weight change in the form of increase in weight, only one patient suffered from G1 drowsness.14 /27 patients (58.3%) had shown no toxicity of capecitabine proposal, 5( 20.8%) patients were presented by G2 diarrhea, 3 patients (12.5%) presented by G1 hand pain, redness and swelling, only 2(8.3%) patients were presented by G2 nausia and vomiting.Regards docetaxel, more toxicity was observed only 7 (25.9%)who had no toxicity.Hematological toxicity was observed in 20 patients (74%), all are G1,2 except 2 patients showed G4 anemia, 8 (29.6%) patients were observed with G 1,2 pleural effusion  DFS: Disease free survival; OS: Overall survival Continuous variables were expressed as mean (95%CI); categorical variables were expressed as number (percentage); ‡ Chi-square test; † Logrank test; p 1 : p-value for the test between the three arms; p 2 : p-value for the test between the anti-androgen arm and capecitabine arm; p 3 : p-value for the test between anti-androgen and docetaxel arm; p 4 : p-value for the test between capecitabine and docetaxel arm; p<0.05 is significant.
We agreed with Zakaria et al. who reported in their study with inclusion of 77 TNBC patient that the median age was 35.6 with a range of (19-63) and 21∕ 77 patients (27.2%) were AR positive.AR expression was associated with high grade, high KI 67, positive nodal status and CA15-3.Along with her study, nobody died in AR positive patients, these patients received bicalutamide 50 mg once daily over 2 years as treatment duration with better 2 and 3 year OS which were 85% and 78% with p values of <0.001, 0.0005 respectively; bicalutamide was well-tolerated toxicity, no grade 3 and 4 adverse events in TNBC AR positive patients as well as 6 (28.57%) out of 21 patients presented in the form of 3 patients presented with nausea, two patients presented with breast fullness, tenderness, and hot flushes and only one patient who was presented by weight gain but with better OS and DFS outcome (11).In our study we found that bicalutamide was well tolerated as 17 (81%) patients out of 21 patients had shown no toxicity, only 2 patients showed G2 hot flushes, one patient showed weight change in the form of an increase in weight, and only one patient suffered from G1 drowsiness.These were all tolerated with more affordability.The mean 3-year DFS was 35.3 months in patients who received bicalutamide as extended treatment and better OS.
In our study, 13/27 patients (42.7%) had shown toxicity to capecitabine proposal, 5 (20.8%) patients presented with G2 with significance P=0.001, better DFS was in the favor of bicalutamide administration.3 years overall survival (OS) in patients who received bicalutamide better than those received capecitabine or docetaxcel but of no significance P=0.46 (Table V and Figure 2).

DISCUSSION
In the current study, we investigated the clinic-pathological criteria of triple-negative breast cancer patients who were conducted at our institutes at a specific period with high lighting on the proposed treatment such as antiandrogen (bicalutamide), capecitabine and docetaxel as an extended treatment In this study we found that negative androgen expression had shown strong associations with younger age (≤35 years), premenopausal status, higher grade, extracapsular extension, lymphovascular invasion, Ki 67, and CA15-3, this was agreed with Farag et al. who studied the prevalence of androgen receptor expression in 90 patients of TNBC and the criteria of their clinic-pathology with no treatment proposal and revealed that AR negative patients was significantly associated with higher grade, higher stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, vascular, perineural invasion and high CA15-3 (19).
In our study 71/80, patients received adjuvant radiotherapy post adjuvant chemotherapy protocols such as AC-Taxens, carboplatin-Taxens, and EC-Taxens.Pal et al. confirmed the efficacy of combination treatment for TNBC patients (20).These findings were focused on evidence-based treatment  TNBC patients may benefit from antiandrogen treatment as it is well tolerated with significantly lower toxicity than that of chemotherapy, and it can be proposed with other agent combinations (8,(26)(27)(28).We agree with Locatelli et al. who stated that low dose maintenance capecitabine was an attractive approach with low cost, good tolerability, and manageability, especially in high-risk disease (29).
Our recommendation is to encourage further collaborative studies on a larger number of studied cases to gain more

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Kaplan Meier plot of the studied arms, Left panel: Disease-free survival (A), Right panel: Overall survival (B).

Table I :
Clinicopathological features, treatment, and outcome of triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Table II :
Relationship between clinicopathological features and androgen receptor IHC staining.6 (22.2%) patients exhibited G1, 2 hepatotoxicity.All previous manifestations were well controlled by medical treatment and proper observations (Table III , IV).

Table III :
Toxicity profile of anti-androgen arm.

Table IV :
Toxicity profile of capecitabine arm and docetaxel arm.

Table V :
Comparison between anti-androgen arm, capecitabine arm, and docetaxel arm regarding survival outcome.
(16)tients presented by G3 diarrhea, on the other hand hematological toxicity was observed in 5 patients in the form of anemia, in our study The 3 years DFS was 79.2%, 3 years OS 83.3% that was near to what was reported by Abdelaziz et al. as 3 years OS was 86.4%, while 3 year DFS was 81%.22; (24) in contrary to Alagizy et al., who studied 41 patients of TNBC and reported higher adverse effects of extended metronomic capecitabine after adjuvant chemotherapy such as G1 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia in 13 patients (31.7%);G 1 diarrhea in five patients (12.2%); and G1 vomiting in two patients (4.9%) with no G3∕ 4 adverse effects.follow-upmeandisease-freesurvival(DFS)was 42.4 months (95% CI).overall survival was 44.34 months (95% CI) with a lower incidence of recurrence and distant metastasis in comparison to other studies(25).Abdelmaksoud et al. investigated the role of docetaxel in an extended treatment of 31 patients with triple negative breast cancer with a 3-year DFS and OS of 56.4 and 78.1, respectively, and a tolerable toxicity profile, and encouraged the use role of metronomic docetaxel for better survival gains(16).