Material and Method: In this descriptive study, we retrospectively reviewed the archive records of the pathology departments of one university hospital and two private hospitals serving in the province of Çorum. A total of 138,973 recorded pathology reports were reviewed. Metastatic cancers with a known primary source were excluded. A total of 2184 cases with a diagnosis of cancer were recorded by gender, age, and system/organ and classified to 10 most frequent types of cancer both in general and in terms of gender distribution.
Results: The male to female ratio was 1.44 and the mean age was 64.26 years. The cancer is most commonly encountered between 70 and 79 years of age (35.27%) in males whereas the second most common interval was 60 to 69 years of age (23.88%). In females, the cancer is most commonly encountered between 70 and 79 years of age (24.16%) whereas the second most common interval was 60 to 69 years of age (22.60%). The top five cancers were skin (33.60%), prostate (13.87%), stomach (9.07%), urinary bladder (8.61%) and breast (7.88%).
Conclusion: Distribution of organ/system involvement of cancer cases that were diagnosed in Çorum is quite different from the data regarding Turkey in general. Development of cancer registry centers, upgrading to an active registry system and having all cancer data from health institutions unified in a single organization are mandatory to achieve reliable data.
The fact that data from pathology departments is constantly being recorded and also that the science of pathology had a substantial growth in the global scale have contributed to the construction of a substantial database of cancer records. The previous studies that were performed in our country during the last three decades tried to reveal the distribution of malignant tumors by geographical, gender and organs involved[6-19]. A recent study reported that age and sex adjusted crude death rate of cancer in Çorum was 21.92[20], however, there has not yet been any report regarding the frequency and distribution of cancer subtypes in this province.
The present study aimed to determine the frequency distribution of cancer cases by age groups, gender and organ location in Çorum. We also aimed to help obtain accurate knowledge that would be useful when conducting future studies and also to contribute to the establishment of data for regional tumor statistics.
Table I: Organ/system and gender distribution of the study group
Table II: Organ/system distribution of the ten most frequent cancers among women
Table III: Organ/system distribution of the ten most frequent cancers among men
There were 415 patients (19%) under 50 years of age and 1769 (81%) patients over 50 years of age. The frequency peaks between 70 and 79 years of age in males and females. Cancer was most commonly encountered between 70 and 79 years of age (35.27%) in males whereas the second most common interval was 60 to 69 years of age (23.88%). In females, cancer was most commonly encountered between 70 and 79 years of age (24.16) whereas the second most common interval was 60 to 69 years of age (22.60) (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Male-female distribution of cases by age groups.
According to the systems involved, the skin at 33.31%, gastrointestinal system at 18.45%, male genital system at 14.65%, urinary system at 9.57% and breast at 7.88% were the top five systems. Among the skin cancers, the patients with the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (521 cases, 70.98%) comprised the highest number of cases. The squamous cell carcinoma (172 cases, 23.43%) and the malignant melanoma (23 cases, 3.13%) were the second and third most frequently diagnosed cancers, respectively.
The establishment of cancer registry systems is of importance for etiologic causes to be revealed, necessary interventions to be made for cancer prevention and for cancer biology studies to be developed and controlled. The previous studies that were performed in our country during the last three decades tried to reveal the distribution of malignant tumors by geographical, gender and organs involved[6-19].
Cancer cases have been included to the list notifiable diseases since 1982. The first population based cancer registry system was established in 1992 in İzmir and Diyarbakır. In our country, there has been 11 active Cancer Registry Centers that collect the data through this system since 2010. These provinces are Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Samsun, Eskişehir, Erzurum, Edirne, Trabzon, Gaziantep, Malatya and Bursa[4]. According to the 2013 data from the Cancer Department in the Ministry of Health of Turkey, the most common types and their incidence rates among women are as follows; breast (40.7), thyroid (16.2), colorectal (13.2), corpus uteri (8.6) and lung (8.2), whereas those among men are as follows; lung (69.2), prostate (37.6), urinary bladder (21.7), colorectal (20.8) stomach (18.0)[21].
In our study, skin cancer is the most common tumor among men and women. Early diagnosis on skin surface is very easy to make. Also, because the skin surface can easily be visualized, there is no need for superior hospital standards for surgical procedures. Our results are similar to those reported by others in our country[6-10]. This high frequency may be related with the ease of the early diagnosis and may also result from the prolonged exposure to sunlight and the depletion of the ozone layer, as well.
In our study, breast cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer among women. When the cases with skin cancer were excluded, breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer with 31.21% and this result is similar with the literature. The breast cancer was also the most frequently diagnosed cancer in series reported by some others[9,11-16]. The studies reported by Tasdemir (11), Basak[6], Kandiloglu[17] and Ozekinci[8] are similar to ours where breast cancers are the second most frequently diagnosed cancers after skin cancers.
In our study, thyroid cancer which mainly affects women was found in 0.70% (n=9) of men whereas it was the third most frequently diagnosed cancer with 12.64% (n=113) among women. This finding is similar to that in the literature and to the data from the Cancer Department of Turkey[21]. The incidence is being reported as 3-5.5/100.000 among women and 0.5-2/100.000 among men in the literatüre[22]. Our findings are similar to those reported by others[6,11,14, and 18]. It is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in series of Bozkurt[7], fourth in series of Özekinci[8] and fifth in series of Bayram[19]. The doubt that the radioactive cloud which formed as a result of a nuclear accident occurred in a neighboring country in the mid- 1980s might also have influenced our region has given rise to many speculations about increasing number of cancer cases. It is known that radioactivity acts as an etiological factor especially in thyroid carcinomas[23]. Although thyroid cancer was approximately the 10thmost common type in Black Sea Region until 1990, it has risen to top ranks in recent years[22]. The improvement of the imaging technologies for the thyroid gland and the high sensitivity of the clinic-radiologic and pathologic needle aspiration are of importance in the early detection of thyroid cancers.
In our study, colorectal cancer was the fourth and fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer in both women and among men. According to the data from the US, colorectal cancer is the second and third most frequently diagnosed cancer among women and men respectively, whereas it is the third most common cancer following breast and thyroid cancers among women and the fourth most common cancer after lung, prostate and urinary bladder cancers among men[3]. Our study results are similar to the series of some others[9,10,12]. Early detection of adenomatous polyps by endoscopic methods and their removal is the key for the prevention of colorectal cancers. The simple screening tests such as occult blood test, barium imaging and colonoscopy (which is the gold standard due to its high sensitivity) are among the methods of importance in early diagnosis.
The stomach incidence and mortality have decreased in many parts of the world and all over Europe[3]. It was the third most frequently diagnosed cancer among our study group and was the fifth and fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer among women and men, respectively. The increasing consumption of fresh food, vegetables and fruits, avoidance from ingestion of salt and convenience food, eradication of H. pylori, reduction in smoking in developed areas, endoscopic screening methods and use of photofluorography in Japan are among the leading causes of the decrease observed in the incidence of stomach cancer[3].
The prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer when the skin cancer was excluded. The data from the Department of Cancer reveal that the prostate cancer is the second most common cancer after lung cancer and this data is consistent with our study. Although the series reported by Arıca[9] has similar findings to that of ours, we found unlikely that the urinary bladder cancers were the third most frequently diagnosed cancers after prostate cancers in our study. The prostate cancer is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer in series reported by Çolak[14] and Basak[6]. We think that widespread use of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test helped to achieve significant results in early diagnosing.
In our study, urinary bladder cancer was the third most frequently diagnosed cancer among men. It was detected in a minority of women. Our finding that urinary bladder cancer is four times more common among men than women is consistent with data from Turkey[24]. Unlike the developed countries, urinary bladder cancer gradually increases in incidence in developing countries. Urinary bladder cancer was the second most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in the series reported by Arıca[9] and was the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in those reported by Basak[6] and Çolak[14].
In conclusion, data from 3 pathology laboratories were analyzed in our study. The high rate of thyroid cancer among women is consistent with the literature and this finding may be explained by the fact that Çorum province located in Black Sea Region and it has a specific geological landform. The ease of the early diagnosis is of importance in these results. The low frequency of the diagnosis frequency of lung cancer is misleading and this may be explained by the patients predilection to apply to the superior hospitals in Ankara. Similarly, eight patients in this study had positive histopathological findings in pericardial/pleural fluid samples and 11 patients had bone metastasis. However, no other registry was found regarding these patients. These findings do not truly indicate that these patients had primary neoplastic involvement in pericardial/ pleural or bone tissues. Therefore, efforts should be made for further development of an active cancer registry system. In addition, paving the way for the development of the pathology department within the context of molecular scale, establishing the radiation oncology department and further improvement of medical and surgical oncology specialties will help achieving significant results in improvement of diagnosis and treatment stages of cancer and in decreasing its mortality. It may be ascertained that it could be achieved in our country as well, to obtain more reliable data if the development of a widespread cancer registry system is undertaken.
As there is no active cancer registry database and we lack information on the total number of population at risk, this report did not provide information about cancer incidence and prevalence in Çorum city.
1) Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma JT. The global burden of disease:
2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
2008.
2) Ferlay J, Shin, HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM.
GLOBOCAN 2008, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide:
IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon International Agency for Research
on Cancer; 2010. 29.
3) Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global
Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69-90. [ Özet ]
4) Türkiyede Kanser Kayıtçılığı. Ankara: TC Sağlık Bakanlığı
Kanserle Savaş Dairesi Başkanlığı; 2011. 1-29.
5) TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı, available at: http://
www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/dosya/1-87578/h/istaturk2012.pdf
6) Başak K, Aksoy F. Ankara Numune Hastanesiinde 1984-1992
Yılları Arasındaki Kanser Dağılımının Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara
Patoloji Bulteni. 1993;10:62-71.
7) Bozkurt K, Bektaş SS, Doğru N. Şırnak ilinin kanser istatistikleri.
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2011;27:230-4.
8) Özekinci S. Patoloji arşivindeki 10 yıllık kanser (1991-
2000) olgularının genel değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi.
2007;34:164-9.
9) Arıca S, Nazlıcan E, Özer C, Şilfeler DB, Arıca V, Özgür T,
Özaydın Ü. Hatay ilinde 2008 yılı kanser vakaları sıklığı ve
dağılımı. Klinik ve Deneysel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2011;2:192-5.
10) Aydın Ö, Polat A, Düşmez D, Eğilmez R. Mersin ilinde kanser
sıklığı ve dağılımı üzerine bir çalışma. Turk Patoloji Derg.
2000;16:48-50.
11) Taşdemir E, Demir C, Dilek İ, Atmaca M. Van ili ve çevresinde
malign tümörlerin dağılım sıklığı. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2010;17:114-7.,
12) Haydaroğlu A, Bölükbaşı Y, Özsaran Z. Ege Üniversitesiinde
kanser kayıt analizleri: 34134 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Turk
Onkoloji Dergisi. 2007;22:22-8.
13) Alıcı S, İzmirli M, Doğan E. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Tıbbi Onkoloji Bilim Dalına başvuran kanser hastalarının
epidemiyolojik değerlendirmesi. Turk Onkoloji Dergisi. 2006;21:
87-97.
14) Çolak HE, Yomralıoğlu T. Kanser Vakalarının Coğrafi Bilgi
Sistemleri ile İrdelenmesi: Trabzon Örneği. HKM Jeodezi
Jeoinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi. 2007;96:39-47
15) Ecirli Ş, Borazan A, Tek B, Deveci A, Polat H. Selçuk
Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesine
1993-99 yılları arasında kabul edilen erişkin kanser vakalarının
değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences.
2002;22:349-53.
16) Kılıç S, Kömürcü Ş, Rzayev M, Özet A, Kır T, Arpacı F.
GATA Tıbbi Onkoloji Bilim Dalında izlenen hastaların bazı
sosyodemografik özellikleri ve tanıları. Gulhane Medical Journal.
2004;46:115-24.
17) Kandiloğlu AR, Postacı H. SSK Buca Eğitim Hastanesi
Patoloji Bölümünde İncelenen Materyal İçerisinde Kanser
Sıklığı ve Dağılımı Son İki Yılda İncelenen 30671 Materyalin
Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Patoloji Bulteni. 1995;12:74-8.
18) İzmirli M, Altın S, Dernek BO, Ünsal M. SSK Okmeydanı Eğitim
ve Araştırma Hastanesi Onkoloji Merkezinin 1999-2004 yılları
kanser istatikleri. Turk Onkoloji Dergisi. 2007;22:172-82.
19) Bayram İ, Reçber D, İbiloğlu İ, Uğraş S. Bir patoloji anabilim
dalında kanser sıklığı ve dağılımı. Ege Tıp Dergisi. 2005;44:21-7.
20) Koç H, Cengiz MA, Savaş N. Kanser ölüm hızının
haritalandırılması: Türkiye için kesitsel bir çalışma örneği.
Mapping of cancermortality rate: Crosssectionalstudy of Turkey.
Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2011;4:197-210.
21) Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu, Kanser Daire Başkanlığı, Kanser
istatistikleri available at. http://www.kanser.gov.tr/dairefaaliyetleri/
kanser-istatistikleri.html
22) Karagöz F, Yıldız L, Barış S, Özdamar Ş, Bakırtaş M, Aydın O.
Ondokuzmayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi 1991-1996 yılları
tiroid kanser istatistikleri. Ondokuzmayis Universitesi Tıp Derg.
1998;15:324-9.
23) Lechago J, Gould VE. Bloodworths endocrine pathology. 3 ed.
Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins; 1997;195-7.
24) Eser S, Özdemir R. Dünya ve Türkiyede mesane kanseri
epidemiyolojisi. Uroonkoloji Bulteni. 2012;11:1-9. [ Özet ]